David hume's argument against belief in the existence of miracles - david hume was a british empiricist, meaning he believed all knowledge comes through the senses he argued against the existence of innate ideas, stating that humans have knowledge only of things which they directly experience. Note that this is not an argument against the possibility of miracles hume's conclusion is not that miracles do not happen rather, his conclusion is that no evidence is sufficient to establish that a miracle has occurred, that even if a miracle has occurred we ought not to believe in it. (garrett 1997: 92, 94) similarly, david owen holds that hume's problem of induction is not an argument against the reasonableness of inductive inference, but, rather hume is arguing that reason cannot explain how we come to have beliefs in the unobserved on the basis of past experience (owen 1999: 6) we see that there are a variety of.
2 hume's argument against belief in miracles hume thinks that they cannot, and indeed that no rational person would base belief in god on testimony that miracles. All attempts to sum up david hume's views on religion stumble when they turn to what is, on the face of it, the most basic question of all: was he an atheist or an agnostic the case against. David hume: david hume, scottish philosopher, historian, economist, and essayist known especially for his philosophical empiricism and skepticism despite the enduring impact of his theory of knowledge, hume seems to have considered himself chiefly as a moralist.
David hume's anti miracle belief essay 1577 words 7 pages the problem of miracles is an ancient one that has persisted for most of human history, but that has been addressed with some depth only in the last few centuries. Of miracles is the title of section x of david hume's an enquiry concerning human understanding (1748. Hume's argument is actually directed against testimony-based belief in the miraculous, although others have extended the argument to the case of miracles directly experienced it proceeds by two steps. David hume's various writings concerning problems of religion are among the most important and influential contributions on this topic in these writings hume advances a systematic, sceptical critique of the philosophical foundations of various theological systems. This argument is a good example of one which seems to work only against a platonic, rather than a christian, view of life after death christians who think of life after death as a decision of god are in this respect different from platonists who regard the immortality of the soul as guaranteed by its nature.
According to hume, only scepticism about the existence of the external world remains in this paper, the arguments from constancy and coherence will be summarised and it will be argued that they are not as irrational as hume makes them out to be. David hume was a british empiricist, meaning he believed all knowledge comes through the senses he argued against the existence of innate ideas, stating that humans have knowledge only of things which they directly experience these claims have a major impact on his argument against the existence. Hume claims that causation is a habit of association, a belief that is unfounded and meaningless still, he notes that when we repeatedly observe one event following another, our assumption that we are witnessing cause and effect seems logical to us.
-the miracles of each religion argue against all other religions and their miracles, and so even if a proportion of all reported miracles across the world fit hume's requirement for belief, the miracles of each religion make the other less likely. Hume first refers to this idea in §iv - 'the supposed tye or connexion between the cause and effect, which binds them together, and renders it impossible, that any other effect could result from the operation of that cause' (111. Summary in dialogues concerning natural religion hume explores whether religious belief can be rational because hume is an empiricist (ie someone who thinks that all knowledge comes through experience), he thinks that a belief is rational only if it is sufficiently supported by experiential evidence.
David hume (1711 - 1776) was a scottish philosopher, economist and historian of the age of enlightenmenthe was an important figure in the scottish enlightenment and, along with john locke and bishop george berkeley, one of the three main figureheads of the influential british empiricism movement. It is also the clearest and least convincing example of hume's religious doublespeak, in which he professes still to believe what the arguments he describes completely undermine. Thus, hume's argument against miracles had a more abstract basis founded upon the scrutiny, not just primarily of miracles, but of all forms of belief systems it is a common sense notion of veracity based upon epistemological evidence, and founded on a principle of rationality, proportionality and reasonability. David hume (1711-1776), a scottish philosopher, was an agnostic, ie, he did not believe there is sufficient evidence to justify the confident affirmation that god exists in 1748, the scholar issued his famous volume, essays concerning human understanding.